PaperShow for Teachers - Interesting Classroom Use

Today I had the opportunity to work with a teacher and show her how she could use PaperShow for Teachers in the classroom. As luck would have it, all of her students were going to be taking the NJ Drivers Written Exam and she needed to review the material with them. Rather than do a traditional question and answer session the teacher began to draw different scenarios on the PaperShow for Teachers notebook that the students could visualize and then annotate on the paper. The session was extremely engaging and interactive but more importantly the students really enjoyed writing on the PaperShow for Teachers notebook and reviewing the material. You can see above one of the images that was captured during the session. For an entire period we were able to engage the students in a highly interactive fashion and help them review key points that they could expect to know for the NJ Drivers Written Exam. How are you using PaperShow for Teachers in the classroom? Interested in learning how you can use PaperShow for Teachers in the classroom? If so, then sign up here for a free webinar.

Emotionally Intelligent Parenting: How to Raise a Self-Disciplined, Responsible, Socially Skilled Child [Kindle Edition]

It was really exciting to learn today that my book that I coauthored several years ago-Emotionally Intelligent Parenting: How to Raise a Self-Disciplined, Responsible, Socially Skilled Child [Kindle Edition], Elias, Tobias & Friedlander  is available in a Kindle Edition and is ready to be downloaded. You will find the book easy to read with lots of timely advice, humor, and stories. If you have a Kindle you can click in the link below to download the book. Let me know how you like it.

SmartDraw VP Upgrade -Adds New Mind Mapping Features

If you follow the mind mapping arena you will probably have noticed the blogs and videos that SmartDraw has created about the benefits of visual communication. The videos are done very well and really speak to the heart of the issue- with the right visuals we can all be more efficient and productive at what we do.SmartDraw VP has a good balance of tools for many of the tasks that you may need to accomplish throughout the day. While the mind mapping features that are found in SmartDraw VP are not as extensive as a stand alone application there is a synergy among the tools that might make it an ideal tool for the work you do. The mind mapping tool in SmartDraw VP is ideal for brainstorming, project planing and for developing time lines. SmartDraw VP lets you quickly move from the mind mapping view to a time line or Gantt chart view with a click of the mouse.

In the recent upgrade to SmartDraw VP you will now be able to format your mind map Center, All Right or All Left giving you new options for how your mind maps are displayed on the screen. I for one find that many people who are not familiar with mind mapping have an easier time when I present a mind map using the All Right formatting. Similarly, it is now really easy to create a mind map in SmartDraw VP by importing a text outline. I tried this feature by typing a simple outline into the Notepad and importing it into SmartDraw VP. After each main idea I pressed the Enter key and for each subtopic I used the Tab key to indent the text. Once I had my outline completed I used the new Import Text Outline feature and voila there I had a perfectly formatted mind map.If you are eligible I would highly recommend that you upgrade to the latest version of SmartDraw VP so that you can take advantage of these new mind mapping features. SmartDraw VP is a handy tool with lots of  ways to help you become more productive in your working environment. If you haven't taken a look at SmartDraw VP, it has a good balance of tools that can give you the edge as you head down the path to becoming a better visual communicator. You can download a 30 day trial of SmartDraw VP by clicking on this link.

Personal Touch High Tech- The Livescribe Pen in Action

If you are in business you know just how important written communication is in helping you to stay connected to your clients. While a lot has been written about business people writing personal notes, I know that it is time consuming and can add some costs to the bottom line. But what would happen if you could write that personal note in your handwriting and send it off as an email? Now you get the best of both world- the ability to write a personal note in your handwriting and send it off as an email. Using the Livescribe Echo Pen and the new Livescribe Connect services I was able to write my personal note on the Flip Notepad paper and then send it via the Livescribe Connect service to a special educator who registered for the Summer iPad Institute which will be held July 12 and 13th at the Warren Middle School, Warren, NJ. (If you are interested in registering for the iPad Institute click here). Think of what a nice touch it is when he receives via an email a personal note for me confirming his registration. Using the Livescribe Connect Service was extremely easy and all of the mechanics of the email are handled from within the Livescribe Desktop Software.

In order to accomplish this task, I simply wrote my note on the Flip Notepad paper and then synched it to the Livescribe Desktop Software. I then Right clicked on the handwritten note and choose the Email option. I had the option to send the handwritten note as a PDF or PNG file and selected the PDF format. Once I clicked OK a small dialog box popped up that let me enter the recipients email address with a subject. Clicking OK sent the email with the handwritten note. It is really that simple. So if you are looking for a high tech way to add that personal touch you may want to think about using the Livescribe Echo Pen to send up your next personal handwritten note.

HP-UX: What now? / E agora?

This article is written in English and Portuguese
Este artigo está escrito em Inglês e Português

English version:

You know I usually stick to Informix related topics, but a few weeks ago something was announced that has to make us think... As we all know by now, Oracle announced that future versions of their software products will not support HP-UX running on Intel Itanium chips.
Why do we have to think about it? Well, from my personal perspective because it raises a lot of serious doubts/questions. Let's see:

1. First you read in the announcement that Intel is not truly committed to Itanium. The exact words are "Intel management made it clear that their strategic focus is on their x86 microprocessor and that Itanium was nearing the end of its life". Intel denied this in the following days. Who do we believe? The company that owns the chip in question or another (now also) hardware supplier? Is it normal that a company discontinues it's products on a platform that has not announced it's end of life plans?
   
   
2. The announcement was made just before an important HP shareholders meeting... We could of course believe this was just a coincidence
   
   
3. In the last months a lot of news came up referring to personal wars between Oracle's and HP's executives (ex HP CEO is now a very important Oracle executive). Meanwhile ex SAP CEO has been appointed as HP CEO, and Oracle and SAP had an ongoing court trial started at the time he was SAP's CEO. All these an point 2) may lead us to the feeling that while personalities clash, customers suffer. There's nothing wrong with having strong personalities as leaders of large companies, on the contrary. But we would expect their egos not to cause harm to their customers (of course "harm" translates into costs, uncertainty, fear and doubts - typically FUD that competitors like to spread, but in this case competitors don't have to bother...)
   
   
4. Oracle mentions that others (Microsoft and Red Hat) have previously discontinued support for Itanium. This is true, but there is a big difference: The market share that these two companies had in the Itanium market was considered irrelevant. Now, for Oracle, the situation is completely different. They have a large share of Itanium customers (accordingly to this blog, there are around 140.000 Oracle/Itanium customers)
   
   
5. Some people argue that supporting a platform has it's costs. Of course this is true, but the costs are certainly well covered if the above number holds true. That's part of the business. In order to provide a product, you incur in certain costs. And also note that Oracle always said, wrote an publicized that their code base was the same independently of the platform. So using this as an argument is hardly acceptable...
   
   
6. Many people think this is just a commercial move from Oracle. They're trying to weak a competitor position while at the same time they hope to raise their own hardware sales. We can accept that this is normal, but we should keep in mind a few things. First, just a while ago Oracle choose HP as an hardware partner (remember Exadata?). Secondly Oracle CEO has said that it would like to see Oracle becoming the IBM of the sixties (integrated stack where the margins would be bigger), but that it would keep its software running on competitor platforms. Well something has changed :)
   
   
7. Will this be the only case, or will Oracle do the same in the future with other OS? The fact is that the number of OS and Hardware vendors for enterprise computing is shrinking. You currently have Microsof Windows on Intel x86, IBM AIX on System p, HP-UX on Itanium, Solaris Sparc, Linux on Intel x86, and Solaris on Intel (I'm explicitley forgeting other platforms like IBM System Z and HP NonStop). Oracle is doing it's best to eliminate HP-UX/Itanium. Will it stop there? Or will it proceed it's path to become "the IBM of the 1960s" (meaning the closed system that locked customers in)? Note that IBM still suffers with the image it created at the time.

The above are just a list of some important points. I may be missing a few. The announcement must had a significant impact on HP Itanium customers running Oracle software. Imagine that you wake up one morning and find out that the software vendor you choose gave up supporting your platform. Of course you'll have support for your existing products, but you'd really appreciate a roadmap... By the way, wasn't that the same company that 10 years ago accused IBM of not having a roadmap for Informix? It's funny when we put things into perspective...
So, assuming you're one of those customers what will you do? You have a few options:

1. You jump on the Oracle train and buy a one way ticket... I mean you choose Sparc for your upcoming hardware renovation... You don't know where the train will take you... You don't even know how much it will cost you... Specially because you just bought a one way ticket... Once you're "there" you'll figure what what price the next ride will cost... One thing you know: You'll be traveling with the same company since no other operates in the same region...
   
   
2. You choose another hardware platform, and you really hope the same trick will not be played again
   
   
3. You change your software supplier

I'd say none of the options above looks particularly attractive. But in case you need another database (and you're able to get your application running against it), you should really consider Informix. Here's why:

1. It's robust, easy to use, reliable, works well in virtualized environments etc., but you should already know that
   
   
2. It has a roadmap and has just completed a decade of improvements after the IBM acquisition
   
   
3. It belongs to a company that will try to sell you it's hardware, because it believes it's good, and not because it tends to be the only option to run it's software
   
   
4. It's already very well integrated with many of the other IBM software portfolio, and this is assumed to be a continuous effort
   
   
5. It has a long history of working well with HP-UX (traditionally on PA-RISC and now with Itanium). A search for "informix" in the HP site will show you several HP documents about integration between Informix and HP-UX

To wrap up this article, I'd like to put here a few links that relate to this topic. I hope they'll allow you to see what's being written about this Oracle announcement, and to form your own opinion about it.

• The original Oracle announcement
  http://www.oracle.com/us/corporate/press/346696
  
• The Register article about the announcement
  http://www.theregister.co.uk/2011/03/23/oracle_stops_itanium_development/
• The Register article covering HP and Intel answer to the announcement
  http://www.theregister.co.uk/2011/03/24/intel_hp_itanium_defense/
• The Register article overview of the users thoughts about the announcement
  http://www.theregister.co.uk/2011/04/26/gabriel_oracle_itanium_survey/
• Gabriel Consulting survey referenced in the previous link
  http://www.gabrielconsultinggroup.com/recent-research/doc_download/42-oracle-survey-whats-the-real-reason-oracle-dropped-itanium.html
• HP echoes some users comments
  http://www.hp.com/hpinfo/newsroom/press/2011/110414xa.html?jumpid=reg_R1002_USEN
• HP site dedicated to this issue
  http://h18004.www1.hp.com/products/solutions/customers_first.html
• HP blog from an executive containing a FAQ
  http://h30507.www3.hp.com/t5/Mission-Critical-Computing-Blog/FAQs-from-HP-on-the-Oracle-Itanium-Announcement/ba-p/89977
  

Versão Portuguesa:

Normalmente restrinjo-me a assuntos exclusivamente relacionados com Informix, mas há algumas semanas atrás foi anunciado algo que nos tem de fazer pensar.... Como já todos deveremos saber nesta altura, a Oracle anunciou que futuras versões do seu software não irão suportar HP-UX a correr em chips Itanium.
Porque é que devemos reflectir sobre isto? Bom, na minha opinião pessoal porque isto levanta uma série de dúvidas e questões importantes. Vejamos:

1. Começamos por ler no anúncio que a Intel não está verdadeiramente empenhada no Itanium. As palavras exactas (tradução pessoal) foram: "... a gestão da Intel deixou claro que o foco da sua estratégia é a linha de processadores x86 e que o Itanium se está a aproximar do fim de vida..." . A Intel negou isto nos dias seguintes. Em quem acreditamos? Na empresa que detém o processador em questão ou noutra empresa (agora também) fornecedora de hardware? Será normal que uma empresa anuncie o fim de desenvolvimento dos seus produtos numa plataforma cujo fim de vida não foi sequer anunciado?
   
   
2. O anúncio foi feito imediatamente antes de um encontro de accionistas da HP.... Podemos claro acreditar que isto foi apenas uma coincidência
   
   
3. Nos últimos meses vieram a público uma série de notícias referentes a guerras pessoais entre executivos da HP e Oracle (o ex CEO da HP é agora um quadro importante na Oracle - o número dois na verdade, logo abaixo do Larry Ellison). Entretanto o ex CEO da SAP foi nomeado CEO da HP, e a Oracle e HP tinham um processo em tribunal que remonta ao tempo em que o mesmo era CEO da SAP. Tudo isto e o ponto 2) podem levar-nos a pensar que enquanto as personalidades se chocam os clientes sofrem. Não há nada de errado em que grandes empresas tenham personalidades fortes na sua liderança, bem pelo contrário. Mas seria de esperar que os egos não prejudiquem os respectivos clientes. O "prejuízo" traduz-se em custos, incerteza, medos e dúvidas - o que em Inglês se chama "FUD - fear, uncertainty and doubt -", que normalmente é espalhado pela concorrência, mas que neste caso nem requer esforço da concorrência pois é feiro pelos próprios.
   
   
4. A Oracle referiu que outros (Microsoft e Red Hat) já tinham previamente descontinuado o suporte para Itanium. Isto é verdade, mas há uma enorme diferença: A quota de mercado que estas duas empresas tinham em Itanium não é comparável à da Oracle. Esta tem uma grande percentagem dos clientes Itanium a usarem os seus produtos (de acordo com este blog, existem cerca de 140.000 clientes Oracle/Itanium)
   
   
5. Algumas pessoas defendem que suportar uma plataforma tem os seus custos. Isto é uma verdade óbvia., mas esses custos são largamente cobertos se os números acima forem correctos. Isso faz parte do negócio. Para fornecer um produto as empresas (de qualquer tipo) incorrem em custos. Note-se ainda que a Oracle sempre disse, escreveu e publicitou que o seu código era o mesmo independente da plataforma. Por tudo isto, o argumento do custo de suportar uma plataforma não me parece aceiável...
   
   
6. Muitas pessoas acreditam que isto é apenas uma manobra comercial da Oracle. Estão a tentar enfraquecer um concorrente ao mesmo tempo que tentam aumentar as suas p´roprias vendas de hardware. Podemos encarar isto como algo relativamente normal, mas devemos manter em mente uma série de factos. Primeiro, apenas há algum tempo atrás, a Oracle escolheu a HP como o seu parceiro de hardware (lembram-se do Exadata?). Segundo, o CEO da oracle disse que gostava de ver (tradução pessoal) A Oracle tornar-se a IBM dos anos sessenta (soluções integradas onde as margens são maiores), mas que manteria o seu software a correr nas plataformas da concorrência. Parece que algo mudou entretanto... :)
   
   
7. Será este um caso único, ou irá a Oracle fazer os mesmo com outras plataformas? A verdade é que as plataformas (SO e hardware) para computação empresarial estão a diminuir. Actualmente temos Microsof Windows em Intel x86, IBM AIX em System p, HP-UX em Itanium, Solaris Sparc, Linux em Intel x86, e Solaris em Intel (estou a omitir outras plataformas como IBM System Z e HP NonStop) . A Oracle está a fazer o seu melhor para eliminar HP-UX em Itanium. Irá parar por aí? Ou irá prosseguir os seu caminho para se tornar a "IBM dos anos sessenta" (neste caso um sistema fechado que prende os clientes)? Note-se que a IBM ainda sofre com a imagem criada nessa altura.

Acima está uma lista de alguns pontos importantes. Posso ter esquecido alguns. O anúncio deve ter tido um impacto significativo nos clientes HP Itanium que utilizam software Oracle. Imagine que acorda uma manhã e descobre que o fornecedor de software que seleccionou, deixou de suportar a sua plataforma. Claro que terá suporte para os produtos que já existem, mas certamente apreciaria a existência de um roadmap... Aliás, não foi esta a mesma empresa que há 10 anos atrás acusou a IBM de não ter um roadmap para Informix? É engraçado quando se colocam as coisas em perspectiva...
Assim, assumindo que é um desses clientes, o que irá fazer? A meu ver tem algumas opções:

1. Apanha o compboio da Oracle e compra um bilhete de ida... Ou seja, escolhe SPARC para a sua próxima renovação de hardware... Não sabe para onde o comboio o leva... Nem sequer sabe quanto lhe vai custar... Especialmente porque comprará apenas um bilhete de ida... Depois de "lá" chegar logo verá qual o preço da próxima "viagem"... Uma coisa será certa: Irá viajar com a mesma empresa, pois mais ninguém opera na mesma "região"...
   
   
2. Escolhe outra plataforma de hardware e espera ardentemente que o mesmo truque não seja empregue novamente
   
   
3. Muda de fornecedore de softtware

Diria que nenhuma das opções acima parece particularmente atractiva. Mas caso necessite de uma nova base de dados (e possa colocar a sua aplicação a correr nela), deveria considerar o Informix. Eis porquê:

1. É robusto, confiável, corre bem em ambientes virtualizadoes etc.., mas isto já deverá saber
   
   
2. Tem um roadmap e acabou de completar 10 anos de inovação após a aquisição pela IBMI
   
   
3. Pertence a uma empresa que tentará vender-lhe o seu hardware porque acredita que é bom, e não apenas porque tende a ser a única plataforma onde pode correr o seu hardware
   
   
4. Já está bastante bem integrado com muito do software IBM, e isto é assumidamente um esforço contínuo
   
   
5. Tem uma longa história de bom desempenho em HP-UX (tradicionalmente em PA-RISC e actualmente em Itanium). Uma pesquisa por "informix" no site da HP irá mostrar-lhe vários documentos da HP sobre a integração entre Informix e HP-UX

Para fechar este artigo, gostaria de deixar alguns links relacionados com este assunto. Espero que lhe permitam ver o que tem sido escrito sobre este anúncio da Oracle, e que possa formar a sua p´ropria opinião sobre o tema.

• O anúncio original
  http://www.oracle.com/us/corporate/press/346696
  
• Um artigo no "The Register" sobre o anúncio
  http://www.theregister.co.uk/2011/03/23/oracle_stops_itanium_development/
• Um artigo no "The Register" cobrindo as respostas da HP e Intel
  http://www.theregister.co.uk/2011/03/24/intel_hp_itanium_defense/
• Um artigo no "The Register" sobre as opiniões dos utilizadores sobre o anúncio
  http://www.theregister.co.uk/2011/04/26/gabriel_oracle_itanium_survey/
• Inquérito do "Gabriel Consulting" referenciado no artigo anterior
  http://www.gabrielconsultinggroup.com/recent-research/doc_download/42-oracle-survey-whats-the-real-reason-oracle-dropped-itanium.html
• Alguns ecos sobre o assunto publicados pela HP
  http://www.hp.com/hpinfo/newsroom/press/2011/110414xa.html?jumpid=reg_R1002_USEN
• Um site da HP dedicado ao assunto
  http://h18004.www1.hp.com/products/solutions/customers_first.html
• Um blog de um executivo da HP que contém um FAQ sobre o tema
  http://h30507.www3.hp.com/t5/Mission-Critical-Computing-Blog/FAQs-from-HP-on-the-Oracle-Itanium-Announcement/ba-p/89977
  

Working with PaperShow for Teachers in the Classroom

This past week I have had a chance to work with several teachers showing them how they can use PaperShow for Teachers in the classroom to support their special education students in the classroom. While the first couple of minutes of the sessions were demonstrating the mechanical aspect of how to use PaperShow for Teachers we did get a chance to come up with some great ways to use it in the classroom. Many of the teachers enjoyed being able to to walk around the room when talking to their students while using PaperShow for Teachers as they put up ideas on the board. The students were totally amazed by the technology and all of them enjoyed writing on the PaperShow Notebook and watching their ideas come to life. The two special education teachers that I worked with used PaperShow for Teachers to brainstorm ideas as a pre-writing activity which really provided the students with the support they needed. Another teacher drew a a graphic organizer using the circle and line tools with PaperShow for Teachers and had the students fill in some of the idea bubbles. After the session was over both teachers talked to me about all the possible way they could use PaperShow for Teachers in the inclusion classroom to support students with learning differences. Both special education teachers were really excited with all of the possibilities and how it could be used with students to scaffold their learning.

If you would like a free demo of PaperShow for Teachers please feel free to contact me

MindGenius 4 is Released

MindGenius has been on the fast track with its development cycle and has released MindGenius 4 which is packed with some very useful features. MindGenius 4 adds a new Brainstorming mode which makes it very easy to record your ideas. MindGenius users will also like how the brainstorm session can be associated to a particular question n a Question set which can help to focus the session. Once you are done with the brainstorming session you can create a Question - Centric map based on what you brainstormed that is well organized using the questions as the primary node and the ideas the sibling nodes. This is an extremely useful feature and one that I know many mind mappers will find invaluable.

MindGenius 4 has now added a presentation mode to the product which makes it an ideal tool for developing and presenting your ideas. The Presentation view is easy to use and for those of us that have been PowerPoint to death- using mind maps for our presentations is a refreshing alternative. MindGenius had added lots of other features to the Project Management side of the software package which I will address in another blog post. But for now, download the free Trial of MindGenius and explore all of the new and exciting productivity features that have added to this new version.