I received a question about a particular eLearning Design challenge that someone was facing and I realized that the title of my blog and the way I post doesn't really do justice to talking about design and patterns in designing eLearning in this blog. I'll try to work on that, but here's a list of posts that are relevant to eLearning design and eLearning patterns:
What Clients Really Want
The basis for many of the eLearning design decisions.
Top Ten Suggested New Year's Resolutions for eLearning Professionals
Several elearning design patterns are discussed.
Significant Work Needed to Help Instructional Designers
Changes required in ISD, ADDIE and HPT in order to adapt to the current design environment.
eLearning 1.0, 1.3 and 2.0
The move of eLearning design towards SME and user-generated content.
Course and Courseware are Fading - The Future of eLearning
How we must adapt to the fact that our designs cannot rely on larger chunks of learning - especially in Corporate eLearning.
Future of ISD, ADDIE and HPT
Big impact on how we will be designing eLearning going forward.
Learning Design Different Now? and Future of ISD in a World of Read/Write Web
How is Learning Design different when we are using different learning techniques, especially bottom-up techniques based on.
Learning Design in a Nut Shell
My simple attempt at what learning design and eLearning design is all about.
Reference Hybrid
A particular pattern for designing eLearning.
Thursday, April 5, 2007
Wednesday, April 4, 2007
Captivate and Articulate for Interactive Slide-Based Presentations
I got a question (and you know I love questions):
Certainly, as the person asking the questions states, if you were going for Software Simulation eLearning then Captivate (or the other tools list in my post) would be more appropriate than Captivate. But, in this case, it's not simulation, it's interactive presentation.
For the task described, where the source is initially MS PowerPoint slides, Articulate Presenter is going to be easier to use. Especially if you have animations or anything beyond the slides in your source PowerPoint. There's actually another product that Adobe offers - Adobe Presenter based on Breeze that is a plug-in or add-on to PowerPoint that allows you to continue to author in PowerPoint but it doesn't offer the same level of interaction support as Articulate Presenter.
From the question - "make it fun through graphic effects and movies" doesn't necessarily imply interaction - quizzes, games, etc. But I sincerely hope that somewhere among your 500 slides, you plan to make things interactive. However, if you really are not, then either Articulate Presenter or Adobe Presenter should be fine. I just feel sorry for the person going through the content.
One last point to make on this - these tools are not mutually exclusive. Captivate can be used to create Flash movies that can be embedded inside of Presenter. So, if there's a brief interaction that you feel can be created best in Captivate, you can always do that as well. So depending on how stubborn the person is who is pushing for Captivate, you might suggest that you primarily use Presenter and use Captivate for certain aspects.
We are being asked to use Adobe Captivate on a project. I understand that Captivate is great for simulations and demonstrations of computer tasks, and can be used for scenario-based training for that kind of content. All good.First some good news - I happen to like both of these products and if you look at my posts: Course Authoring and Rapid eLearning Tool Satisfaction and eLearning Course Authoring Tool Satisfaction - More you can see that both of these tools score pretty high in satisfaction. So I'm not alone in my opinion about these tools.
However, this project doesn't involve ANY simulations, demonstrations, or scenario-based training. It's an employee orientation that consists of many (500) slides of text and graphics. We'll make the slides fun with graphic effects and movies, but that doesn't change the slide model.
So, I thought that Articulate Presenter might be a better choice for this project. What do you think?
Certainly, as the person asking the questions states, if you were going for Software Simulation eLearning then Captivate (or the other tools list in my post) would be more appropriate than Captivate. But, in this case, it's not simulation, it's interactive presentation.
For the task described, where the source is initially MS PowerPoint slides, Articulate Presenter is going to be easier to use. Especially if you have animations or anything beyond the slides in your source PowerPoint. There's actually another product that Adobe offers - Adobe Presenter based on Breeze that is a plug-in or add-on to PowerPoint that allows you to continue to author in PowerPoint but it doesn't offer the same level of interaction support as Articulate Presenter.
From the question - "make it fun through graphic effects and movies" doesn't necessarily imply interaction - quizzes, games, etc. But I sincerely hope that somewhere among your 500 slides, you plan to make things interactive. However, if you really are not, then either Articulate Presenter or Adobe Presenter should be fine. I just feel sorry for the person going through the content.
One last point to make on this - these tools are not mutually exclusive. Captivate can be used to create Flash movies that can be embedded inside of Presenter. So, if there's a brief interaction that you feel can be created best in Captivate, you can always do that as well. So depending on how stubborn the person is who is pushing for Captivate, you might suggest that you primarily use Presenter and use Captivate for certain aspects.
Moodle in Corporations
Clive just posted - Apples and Pears - about the eLearningGuild's new report on Learning Management Systems. I was one of the authors of the report and it was interesting to have an opportunity to interview people and see the numbers produced through a pretty extensive interview process.
Clive points out one of the more interesting discoveries in the survey results numbers - Moodle comes back as being used inside lots of corporations. In fact, it appears near the top in market share even among larger corporations.
However, as Clive points out, this is somewhat misleading (and the report covers the difference between an CMS, LMS and TMS). We had a fair amount of debate among the researchers about how to handle the fact that Moodle comes out being used inside a lot of corporations, but often used in a very limited fashion. We tried to handle it by drawing distinctions where possible, but the fact remains that lots of companies are using Moodle.
On the other hand, you should know that when a corporation uses Moodle they often are using it for some very simple course delivery, creating assessments, etc. In fact, if you only have a couple of courses or you need to put up an environment for a couple of eLearning courses, then Moodle may be a great option.
At the same time, every large company that I interviewed who had indicated they used Moodle, were only using Moodle as a short-term solution on the way to something more or as a targeted solution.
Bottom line - consider Moodle for these kinds of situations. But to paraphrase Clint Eastwood - A man's got to know Moodles limitations.
Clive points out one of the more interesting discoveries in the survey results numbers - Moodle comes back as being used inside lots of corporations. In fact, it appears near the top in market share even among larger corporations.
However, as Clive points out, this is somewhat misleading (and the report covers the difference between an CMS, LMS and TMS). We had a fair amount of debate among the researchers about how to handle the fact that Moodle comes out being used inside a lot of corporations, but often used in a very limited fashion. We tried to handle it by drawing distinctions where possible, but the fact remains that lots of companies are using Moodle.
On the other hand, you should know that when a corporation uses Moodle they often are using it for some very simple course delivery, creating assessments, etc. In fact, if you only have a couple of courses or you need to put up an environment for a couple of eLearning courses, then Moodle may be a great option.
At the same time, every large company that I interviewed who had indicated they used Moodle, were only using Moodle as a short-term solution on the way to something more or as a targeted solution.
Bottom line - consider Moodle for these kinds of situations. But to paraphrase Clint Eastwood - A man's got to know Moodles limitations.
Tuesday, April 3, 2007
April Big Question - Content Vendor Value
Since I'm likely not going to be blogging for about a week starting Friday, I thought I'd get an early jump on this month's Big Question from LCB - ILT and Off-the-Shelf Vendors - What Should They Do?
I'll be curious to see what kinds of responses come out around this topic. There's really a lot at stake in this question in that it goes far beyond the question. The reality is that all providers of content are competing in a flat world, with easy access to virtually every other information source and many different, alternative means of content creation. In this world, content producers face real challenges. And this isn't just in corporate training and education. My post - Disruptive Changes in Learning - points to examples such as TV, Music, Press, etc. If you are a producer of content, you are now competing with many new sources.
As a content vendor providing training (Instructor Led or eLearning), you are naturally having to compete with each person's ability to find information via a Google search or through access to a service like Safari (which makes all of the O'Reilly books fully searchable).
One of the most important questions is:
(One exception to this rule - for things like most compliance training where companies are wanting to "check the box" - they will continue to use courses and will want short versions and box checking. Lowest cost will dominate. But courses and courseware will remain.)
The good news is that there's also some hope for innovative companies who can move beyond the business of Courses and Courseware. Generally customers are buying something more than a course or courseware. In IT world, they are transitioning their staff from Java to .Net or from .Net 1.0 to .Net 2.0. In sales they are moving to consultative selling. It might be a culture change initiative. Or employee engagement. Or customer satisfaction. Etc. There's always more to the picture than providing courses and courseware.
My belief is that there's great opportunity to make smart use of new kinds of eLearning Solutions that will have real impact on the actual results that people care about. Take customer satisfaction. In a recent solution for a large retailer, we provided tools that:
There's also this old CEO adage:
If you look at things like Gallup's Q12 Employee Engagement system, it's not terribly complicated, but it sells well because of the mystery.
Now the good news is that it's easier than ever to create solutions that are more interesting than simple courses and courseware. You can hit people many times over the course of time. You can hit them in new ways. On new devices. In virtual training environments (sandboxes). As an example, if I've got a conversion of an IT staff to .Net 2.0, I probably don't want to ship them all to classes at one time. Rather, I'd like to get them trained up a bit and then have them get coached over the course of time. Plus, when it's new technology, having to get it set-up is always a pain as well - maybe you can provide sandboxing support. Further, I probably have some superstars that I give more training to at the start and then provide them with tools and systems to get the rest of the staff up-to-speed. Do you think they can do that on their own? Probably not well. But with some support they might be able to. Maybe the management needs some training as well, but that won't be classroom. Maybe they need some on-going coaching over the beginning of the project. In fact, if you are providing risk reduction over the first few projects, then maybe the solution isn't really training on .Net 2.0 but rather a transition to .Net 2.0 development capability. There's likely a suite of offerings and a series of things that need to happen to get them transitioned. If it was only getting some folks up to speed on .Net 2.0, well they could read a book or go use Google. There's a lot of other barriers.
I know that I'm probably not helping define a specific enough game plan for any vendor and maybe this isn't practical for some people. But my suspicion is that most vendors need to move in this direction in order to sustain margins.
I'm hopeful that we are going to see some interesting discussions on this topic.
I'll be curious to see what kinds of responses come out around this topic. There's really a lot at stake in this question in that it goes far beyond the question. The reality is that all providers of content are competing in a flat world, with easy access to virtually every other information source and many different, alternative means of content creation. In this world, content producers face real challenges. And this isn't just in corporate training and education. My post - Disruptive Changes in Learning - points to examples such as TV, Music, Press, etc. If you are a producer of content, you are now competing with many new sources.
As a content vendor providing training (Instructor Led or eLearning), you are naturally having to compete with each person's ability to find information via a Google search or through access to a service like Safari (which makes all of the O'Reilly books fully searchable).
One of the most important questions is:
What's the added value provided by content providers over alternative information sources?While I often hear lots of answers to these from vendors, it's becoming increasingly difficult for them to have a compelling differentiation. So, there's real problems, especially if you stay with traditional models of Courses and Courseware - see Course and Courseware are Fading - The Future of eLearning. You can't afford to be in that business going forward.
(One exception to this rule - for things like most compliance training where companies are wanting to "check the box" - they will continue to use courses and will want short versions and box checking. Lowest cost will dominate. But courses and courseware will remain.)
The good news is that there's also some hope for innovative companies who can move beyond the business of Courses and Courseware. Generally customers are buying something more than a course or courseware. In IT world, they are transitioning their staff from Java to .Net or from .Net 1.0 to .Net 2.0. In sales they are moving to consultative selling. It might be a culture change initiative. Or employee engagement. Or customer satisfaction. Etc. There's always more to the picture than providing courses and courseware.
My belief is that there's great opportunity to make smart use of new kinds of eLearning Solutions that will have real impact on the actual results that people care about. Take customer satisfaction. In a recent solution for a large retailer, we provided tools that:
- Showed customer satisfaction numbers (that already existed) at the store level so that store managers could identify areas where they needed work.
- Provided a variety of possible interventions the store manager could use (some with content, some that were more like a series of meetings-in-a-box).
- Had store managers create an action plan composed of the steps of these interventions and had that approved with their district manager.
- Helped them remember needed steps and track progress.
- Prompted the district manager's involvement appropriately to reinforce actions.
- Tracked the results so we could figure out what interventions worked and which didn't.
There's also this old CEO adage:
There's margin in mystery.In other words, because we aren't coming in and saying "here's some content we are selling you" - instead, it's a whole system, and tracking, and hitting people with communication over time - it's not as obvious what's going on. Under the hood, it's not terribly complicated, but it's still got some mystery. Probably the best example of this that I've ever worked on was eHarmony. If you've ever taken a personality profile, you know how they come back and seem to know you. eHarmony does that as well. It allows them to command a premium. Same thing is true of a more recent client MyShape. When there's mystery, you can command a premium. More on this in Matching Algorithm.
If you look at things like Gallup's Q12 Employee Engagement system, it's not terribly complicated, but it sells well because of the mystery.
Now the good news is that it's easier than ever to create solutions that are more interesting than simple courses and courseware. You can hit people many times over the course of time. You can hit them in new ways. On new devices. In virtual training environments (sandboxes). As an example, if I've got a conversion of an IT staff to .Net 2.0, I probably don't want to ship them all to classes at one time. Rather, I'd like to get them trained up a bit and then have them get coached over the course of time. Plus, when it's new technology, having to get it set-up is always a pain as well - maybe you can provide sandboxing support. Further, I probably have some superstars that I give more training to at the start and then provide them with tools and systems to get the rest of the staff up-to-speed. Do you think they can do that on their own? Probably not well. But with some support they might be able to. Maybe the management needs some training as well, but that won't be classroom. Maybe they need some on-going coaching over the beginning of the project. In fact, if you are providing risk reduction over the first few projects, then maybe the solution isn't really training on .Net 2.0 but rather a transition to .Net 2.0 development capability. There's likely a suite of offerings and a series of things that need to happen to get them transitioned. If it was only getting some folks up to speed on .Net 2.0, well they could read a book or go use Google. There's a lot of other barriers.
I know that I'm probably not helping define a specific enough game plan for any vendor and maybe this isn't practical for some people. But my suspicion is that most vendors need to move in this direction in order to sustain margins.
I'm hopeful that we are going to see some interesting discussions on this topic.
Corporate eLearning
Corporate eLearning
Blog posts related to Corporate eLearning:
Blog posts related to Corporate eLearning:
- eLearning Tools - Wikis, Blogs and More in Corporate eLearning
- New Debate on Value of Blogs and Wikis in the Enterprise
- Open Source Business Model
- Knowledge Management Core Issues
- Use of iPods and other Mobile Learning
- IBM Taps Employees for Innovation Using Blog Like Tools
- Corporate Learning Laggards?
- Why Wikis Are Conquering the Enterprise
- Wikis - Public vs. Controlled - Why There's No eLearning Wiki
- Will Blogs, Wikis, RSS, Mashups be Used in Corporate eLearning?
- Search - Implications on Knowledge Work
- Corporate eLearning Development: Learning2.0, Identity2.0
- Learning Trends Point To and Shape Corporate eLearning
Learning Management Systems (LMS)
Learning Management Systems
Updated Nov. 2010My most popular post around LMS is (by far):
LMS Satisfaction Features and Barriers
Here are a LOT of other posts that look at all things Learning Managment Systems (LMS):
- Tracking Without an LMS
- LMS Dissatisfaction on the Rise
- Do You WANT an LMS? Does a Learner WANT an LMS?
- Moving from One to Many - LMS Products are Two Generations Behind
- Leading with an LMS - Harmful to Your Health (or Skipping Stages ...
- Tools for On-Demand Information - An LMS?
- Point Solutions vs. Suites and Composition
- LMS Selection Presentation
- LMS Team Size and Time
- Learning Management System RFP
- LMS Selection Presentation Reformulated
- LMS Selection Team and Stakeholders
- LMS Selection Process
- Open Source LMS- eLearning Technology, December 10, 2009
- Test SCORM Courses with an LMS- eLearning Technology, January 13, 2008
- LMS Team Size and Time - Wow 23 Months!- eLearning Technology, October 31, 2007
- How long does it take to select an LMS?- eLearning Technology, January 8, 2009
- Test LMS- eLearning Technology, September 10, 2008
- Communities / Social Networking and LMS Merger- eLearning Technology, December 6, 2007
- What Goes in the LMS?- eLearning Technology, February 5, 2009
- Rapid Learning Management Systems- eLearning Technology, October 20, 2009
- What Makes an LMS Easy to Use?- eLearning Technology, February 11, 2010
- Leading with an LMS - Harmful to Your Health (or Skipping Stages in Bersin's Four Stage Model)- eLearning Technology, June 6, 2006
- LMS RFP- eLearning Technology, October 25, 2007
- Larger LMS Audience Means Lower Satisfaction- eLearning Technology, April 18, 2008
- LMS - Questions- eLearning Technology, November 5, 2007
- Moodle in Corporations- eLearning Technology, April 4, 2007
- Custom LMS Anymore?- eLearning Technology, January 5, 2010
- LMS Tracking of Podcasts and Video Casts- eLearning Technology, February 9, 2010
- One Week to Select an LMS – No Way- eLearning Technology, February 16, 2010
- LMS Solution for Simple Partner Compliance Training
- Low Cost LMS
- LMS and Social Learning- eLearning Technology, March 31, 2009
- LMS Resources- aLearning, May 8, 2010
- LMS RFP- eLearning Technology, October 25, 2007
- More Than One LMS Option- aLearning, February 14, 2010
- Other Open Source LMS Solutions- eLearning 24-7, April 14, 2010
- Take This LMS and Shove It- Living in Learning, May 19, 2010
- LMS Satisfaction Features and Barriers- eLearning Technology, September 20, 2007
- LMS Template- eLearning 24-7, May 21, 2010
- LMS and Social Learning- eLearning Technology, March 31, 2009
- LMS: A Quick SWOT Analysis- Upside Learning Blog, June 16, 2010
- The Great LMS Debate- Element K Blog, June 11, 2010
- A Learning Portal is Not an LMS- Getting Down to Business, May 18, 2010
- Potential Questions to Ask When Having an LMS Demo'd- Discovery Through eLearning, January 14, 2009
- LMS Selection Process- eLearning Technology, October 18, 2007
- Five Things Not to do While Selecting an LMS- Upside Learning Blog, August 27, 2009
- When to LMS- Learnlets, May 18, 2010
- The Standalone LMS is Dead- trainingwreck, October 24, 2009
- Open Source vs Commercial LMS- Learning Next, April 18, 2007
- LMS Launch Happens in 11 More Sleeps- Discovery Through eLearning, September 10, 2009
- Eight Tips for LMS Implementation- Upside Learning Blog, February 17, 2010
- Open Source LMS- eLearning Technology, December 10, 2009
- The Real Cost of a Free (Open Source) LMS!- Upside Learning Blog, April 29, 2010
- Listing the Steps of the LMS is Difficult- Discovery Through eLearning, February 16, 2009
- Top 13 LMS (and Learning Technology) Blogs- Upside Learning Blog, April 15, 2010
- Goodbye LMS?- eLearning Technology, September 5, 2006
- Why Do We Have an LMS?- MinuteBio, July 11, 2010
- Why bash the LMS?- Learnlets, May 10, 2010
- Do You WANT an LMS? Does a Learner WANT an LMS?- eLearning Technology, July 26, 2006
- Enable Learning Anywhere with World’s First Portable LMS- Ignatia Webs, September 29, 2010
- A case for the LMS?- Learnlets, May 6, 2010
- Test LMS- eLearning Technology, September 10, 2008
- Free LMS Comparison Template- aLearning, May 22, 2010
- Open Source LMS Comparison- The Learned Man, April 27, 2007
- New Kind of LMS?- eLearning Technology, January 11, 2007
- Low Cost LMS - Help Needed- eLearning Technology, February 10, 2009
- Tracking Without an LMS- eLearning Technology, May 17, 2006
- The LMS – Will It Survive?- Upside Learning Blog, May 11, 2010
- More LMS Options for Associations on a Budget- aLearning, April 25, 2010
- Sakai 3 Development Process- Experiencing eLearning, June 9, 2009
- The Right Way To Go About Open Source LMS- Upside Learning Blog, October 23, 2009
- LMS Moneyball- eLearning 24-7, March 15, 2010
- Standalone LMS is Still Dead (rebutting & agreeing w/ Dave Wilkins)- trainingwreck, May 15, 2010
- Looking for THE SCORM Resource?- MinuteBio, June 12, 2010
- The LMS must die- Learning Conversations, August 15, 2010
- LMS Contracts – What U Must Have, Need 2 Know- eLearning 24-7, January 8, 2010
- LMS: Strategy or Tool?- Upside Learning Blog, March 18, 2010
- LMS = Losing My Smile- aLearning, February 5, 2010
- Test SCORM Courses with an LMS- eLearning Technology, January 13, 2008
- LMS & LCMS Directory- eLearning 24-7, July 8, 2010
- LMS Customization- eLearning 24-7, December 8, 2009
- Learning Management Systems - Trends and Issues (Brandon Hall Research) Webinar- Discovery Through eLearning, July 8, 2009
- Informal Learning Blog » LMS, we hardly knew ye- Informal Learning, September 4, 2006
- Moodle: Email Notfication Problems- eLearning Blender, April 16, 2009
- ZaidLearn: Any Free Hosted CMS or LMS? (Yes, Obama Says!)- ZaidLearn, May 16, 2009
- A Defense of the LMS (and a case for the future of Social Learning)- Social Enterprise Blog, May 12, 2010
- Moodle LMS: Hot Potatoes is Now Free!- The E-Learning Curve, September 15, 2009
- Association LMS Report & the Entrepreneurial Jeff Cobb- Web Courseworks, November 20, 2009
- Blackboard reinforcing the Status Quo- Learning Technology Learning, October 12, 2009
- The 21st century LMS- Clive on Learning, October 27, 2009
- Picking the Right LMS Logo and Design- eLearning Brothers, January 12, 2010
- Resources for the LMS Selection Process- Kapp Notes, October 21, 2007
- The writings of Lee Kraus: ContentTracking by the LMS- Learning and Technology, January 10, 2007
- Kineo Insights Webinar: The Truth About Open Source – a conversation with Sakai’s Executive Director- Learning Visions, February 25, 2010
- Should an LMS be the only route to learning?- Good Practice, December 9, 2009
- Learning Management Systems: Expert Advice- The eLearning Coach, April 28, 2010
- Dear Blackboard …- Dont Waste Your Time, September 20, 2009
- Adobe Captivate: Analyze and Chart Quiz Data Without an LMS, Part II- I Came, I Saw, I Learned, September 8, 2010
- Top 5 tips on how to make courses SCORM compliant- Spicy Learning, May 7, 2010
- Tackling a New Captivate Project- In the Middle of the Curve, August 21, 2009
- Open Source life, LMSs beyond Moodle- Learning Rocks, December 18, 2008
- Captivate 4 patch update- Adobe Captivate Blog, May 30, 2009
- Text messaging in your teaching- eLearning Acupuncture, March 24, 2009
- First eLearning- The Learning Circuits Blog, October 1, 2008
- SharePoint and the LMS - Time to Converge?, February 9, 2009
- Is Google Analytics the new LMS?!, April 27, 2010
- Is Google Analytics the next LMS? (continued), May 10, 2010
- SharePoint and the LMS - Time to Converge?, February 9, 2009
- The 21st century LMS, November 28, 2009
- The Future of the LMS, August 31, 2009
- OLAT: Swiss Quality Open Source LMS by Joël Fisler, February 24, 2010
- What do your learners want from the LMS?, August 17, 2009
- LMS is Dead! But Long Live LMS!, October 29, 2007
- SyberWorks LMS e-Learning Implementation Podcast #32 Preview, November 6, 2009
- Check It Once … Check It Twice: Your Guide to Choosing the Right LMS by Jessica Athey, July 6, 2010
- The Perfect Learning Management System (LMS), July 21, 2008
- LMS Spotlight: Litmos, September 10, 2010
- When Publishers Buy LMS Companies, October 28, 2009
- LMS is no longer the centre of the universe, May 4, 2010
- Friday ReFlects #2 - LMS Edition, May 28, 2010
- Why it’s hard to find an LMS, September 25, 2008
- Who Is Using Moodle? We are!, August 12, 2009
- LMS Customer Support Expectations, July 17, 2009
- eLearning Development News » Is Moodle your LMS?, May 7, 2007
- gLMS is coming - Google Gears, June 3, 2007
- Connectivist and Constructivist PLEs, September 21, 2010
- How to enrich your free Google based LMS, May 20, 2010
- Will at Work Learning: Elliott Masies LMS Wish List, February 15, 2008
- Facebook vs The LMS: Can Someone explain this to me?, March 20, 2010
- The LCMS at a Crossroads, March 10, 2009
- LMSs that kick ass: Saba, January 2, 2009
- Learning Management Systems that kick ass: Generation21, November 28, 2008
- Mobile Learning at the Tipping Point by Ara A. Ohanian, June 10, 2010
- Cut to 30% eLearning Development Costs, August 17, 2009
- Sakai: Open Source … Open Minds by Larissa Biggers, December 13, 2009
- New SyberWorks Media Center Article – “Hosted (SaaS) Vs. Licensed Cost Analysis of a Learning Management System/Learning Content Management System (LMS/LCMS)”, June 9, 2009
- Beyond Control?, April 30, 2009
- Justifying that LMS, October 13, 2009
- Kill Compliance Training, October 12, 2007
- Have LMSs Jumped The Shark?, March 20, 2009
- LMSs that kick ass: Learn.com, December 26, 2008
- LMSs that kick ass: Meridian KSI, December 19, 2008
- Tracking Instructor-Led Classes in an LMS, July 19, 2008
- Moodle: A fantastic tool for informal learning - and not just “e-learning”, August 31, 2009
- LMSs that kick ass: ElementK’s KnowledgeHub, January 16, 2009
- LMSs that kick ass - OutStart, January 23, 2009
- Stats on LMS Costing & Implementation Time, May 3, 2010
- Camtasia - LMS - LCMS - Best of eLearning Learning August 2009, September 8, 2009
- The LCMS at a Crossroads, March 10, 2009
- Introducing the SCORM Cloud, December 9, 2009
- Thinking Out of the Box: How the University of British Columbia School of Nursing Created a Practice e-Portfolio by Fareed Teja, February 23, 2010
Related Topic Pages
- SumTotal (340)
- Articulate Engage (314)
- LCMS (273)
- Moodle (591)
- Articulate (737)
- SCORM (248)
- Saba (58)
- IMS (353)
- Captivate (470)
- Open Source (601)
- Cornerstone OnDemand (19)
- Articulate Online (10)
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)